Originally Posted by KaSt

You didn't strip anything from the logs on 4.2.13, right?
Did you log anything after 881865?

no I didn't
at that time Incorrect SIM dialog already display.

output after that (idle mode)

Code:

1316607 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,2,500
1316631 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1316633 recv[reg]: OK
1326599 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,1,500
1326619 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1326621 recv[reg]: OK
1506599 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,2,500
1506618 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1506620 recv[reg]: OK
1516600 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,1,500
1516620 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1516622 recv[reg]: OK

I test with FW 1.1.3, the logs was similar.
With FW 1.1.3, the are no 'Incorrect SIM' dialog any more.

What puzzle me, the output was the same,
if I put any simcard: AT&T, my local simcard or with ***sim.

_____
Greetings from Indonesia

Originally Posted by mglist

no I didn't
at that time Incorrect SIM dialog already display.

output after that (idle mode)

Code:

1316607 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,2,500
1316631 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1316633 recv[reg]: OK
1326599 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,1,500
1326619 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1326621 recv[reg]: OK
1506599 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,2,500
1506618 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1506620 recv[reg]: OK
1516600 send[reg]: at+XDRV=5,4,1,500
1516620 recv[reg]: +XDRV: 5,4,0
1516622 recv[reg]: OK

I test with FW 1.1.3, the logs was similar.
With FW 1.1.3, the are no 'Incorrect SIM' dialog any more.

What puzzle me, the output was the same,
if I put any simcard: AT&T, my local simcard or with ***sim.

_____
Greetings from Indonesia

I wish I could see the log for a valid SIM

I test with FW 1.1.3, the logs was similar.
With FW 1.1.3, the are no 'Incorrect SIM' dialog any more.

What puzzle me, the output was the same,
if I put any simcard: AT&T, my local simcard or with ***sim.

First of all, thanks for all these logs, much appreciated.

Second, one question, just for me to be sure to understand.

Your first log was from 4.2.13 with a *SIM (or valid SIM) or with an invalid SIM?
You then say that with 1.1.3 the output is the same both with a *SIM and without, you don't get an "invalid SIM dialog"?

Thanks,
Ka.

Originally Posted by KaSt

First of all, thanks for all these logs, much appreciated.

Second, one question, just for me to be sure to understand.

Your first log was from 4.2.13 with a *SIM (or valid SIM) or with an invalid SIM?
You then say that with 1.1.3 the output is the same both with a *SIM and without, you don't get an "invalid SIM dialog"?

Thanks,
Ka.

The first log from 4.2.13 with a ***SIM and active phone function.

With 4.3.13 & FW113 I can't get active phone (or GSM network reading) with ***SIM,AT&T or Local simcard, but no 'Incorrect SIM' dialog just no signal strength bar.

We don't see baseband activity in the logs. All the logs from firmware.
_____
Greetings from Indonesia

SO guys what does this mean?

Does this mean Xsim will be not be possibe with 04.03.13_G 1.1.3 firmware?

Originally Posted by mglist

The first log from 4.2.13 with a ***SIM and active phone function.

With 4.3.13 & FW113 I can't get active phone (or GSM network reading) with ***SIM,AT&T or Local simcard, but no 'Incorrect SIM' dialog just no signal strength bar.

We don't see baseband activity in the logs. All the logs from firmware.
_____
Greetings from Indonesia

That's why we need to have those logs with a new xSIM. I wonder how they bypass the initial xlck test (I already have some ideas but they're not that viable to get a connection with a real account). Without bypassing that you can't have signal at all on 1.1.3

So Are Sim Solutions Impossible For 04.03.13_g For Ever?

No idea. We'll see that after testing one of those cards that's supposedly working.

Originally Posted by jeppeb

I'm trying to do the same, modem 04.03.13_G with firmware 1.1.1, but i keep getting this error:
kill: not enough arguments

Isn't it possible on firmware 1.1.1?

same thing here with 1.1.3 soft jb 04.02.13_G

any special setup?

Originally Posted by Zf_

No idea. We'll see that after testing one of those cards that's supposedly working.

HOW ABOUT THE RE-PROGRAMMABLE ONES?