[Firmware] 2.0 Beta - Who got it ? (No links) - Page 16

ChronicProductions · #**151** (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 09:01 PM

No, sums of the IPSW. The DMG could very well be watermarked.

PathDaemon · #**152** (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChronicProductions

No, sums of the IPSW. The DMG could very well be watermarked.

I'll edit my post to include them, but why would the IPSWs be any more or less watermarked than the DMGs?

ChronicProductions · #**153** (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PathDaemon

I'll edit my post to include them, but why would the IPSWs be any more or less watermarked than the DMGs?

It's not out of the realm of possibility that Apple is stupid enough to think people will just distribute the dmg instead of the ipsw itself, you never know

sam · #**154** (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 10:44 PM

WEll that DMG is watermarked, I am very certain. Leoaprd DMG were watermarked, other beta given out by apple are.

Well, why watermark a dmg, not the content? It's simple. if you watermark the dmg, you would need to resign it every time to work with itunes, noone will do that, so you mark the dmg, which yu can append a signature to very easy.

Usally keys to sign something liek a ipsw are very well secured, no way they sign a ipsw for every developer indicidually or even on download in a insecure enviorment liek a webserver.

*celebi23* · #**155** (**permalink**) 04-01-2008, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PathDaemon

Saying "don't worry, sums have been compared" isn't good enough for me. I am the anti FUD.

I want public, out-in-the-open comparison.
So:

MD5 (iphone_os__iphone__5a225c.dmg) = eac0b73075ae3b1c****************
MD5 (iPhone1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = 8254ccf38735bc74****************

MD5 (iphone_os__ipod_touch__5a225c.dmg) = ****************c2b6306ac43a4662
MD5 (iPod1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = ****************75703f054db30997

Here's half of each MD5 sum. Someone else post the other half, we compare and find out once and for all of these packages are tagged.

Code:

MD5 iphone_os__iphone__5a225c.dmg = ****************0a3dcf4cfb7796e5
MD5 iPhone1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw  = ****************b38fb432ce982081

MD5 iphone_os__ipod_touch__5a225c.dmg = 0d31077af263b8******************
MD5 iPod1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw = 5f8459c9dd9a2da0****************

Do with this what you will

PathDaemon · #**156** (**permalink**) 04-01-2008, 12:39 AM

With this information, I can conclude that the DMG files distributed of iPhone and iPod touch beta firmware are unique and may be traceable to the downloading ADC account. MD5 sums of both DMGs did not match, but I was unable to match any of the data sent to initiate the download with any information in my DMG.

It would be nice to get someone else's DMG for binary comparison to see where the differences lie, but not important.

However, sums of the IPSW files contained within the DMG did, in fact, match, so it is my opinion that they are not traceable. The complete sums of these IPSWs are below; if they don't correspond to what anyone else has, please make it known.

Code:

MD5 (iPhone1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = 8254ccf38735bc74b38fb432ce982081
MD5 (iPod1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = 5f8459c9dd9a2da075703f054db30997

So, yeah, in the words of celebi23…

Quote:

Originally Posted by celebi23

Do with this what you will

*.max* · #**157** (**permalink**) 04-01-2008, 01:03 AM

I confirm ipsw is not signed. I think they have better things to do than sign each ipsw within dmg.
Maybe you should have posted only a few digits instead of the whole md5. Now anyone could claim they have the same md5 without any proof

And my DMG md5 does not match neither. It starts with 07...

I guess it's a matter of hours now before it breaks free to the bay.
It would be not usable however without pwnage.